ZAHID GHAFOOR versus REHANA RAFIQUE
In the payment of rentals 17 and 24 of the Cantonment Rent Restriction Act 1963, the default tenant's father and landlord had a tenancy agreement under which it was agreed to pay the rent for the rent on a six-month basis. The rent was payable for the months of January to June, and the rent was payable for the months of July and December. In early July, the parties agreed that the tenancy period was over. The tenant will continue to be the son of the original tenant. Was obliged to pay rent according to arrangements between death and parties. The tenant in his written statement did not claim that he was a tenant from month to month, therefore, he was obliged to pay the rent within fifteen days of the end of the contract period. The tenant did not provide any evidence in the proof of the argument that there had not been a deliberate landlord before. The tenant deliberately determined to pay the rent in terms of e and the contract, thus, the rent controller in favor of it under section 17 (2) (ii), the Art under the Rent of Cantonment Rent Restriction Act, 1963 Was not entitled to use. The controller evicted the underwriting tenant, so it was conceivable to guarantee no interference
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Depal Pur lawyer