IMAM ALI versus CHAND BIBI
Section 2, 3, 4 and 5 of the Partition Act, 1893 (Scheduled and Rehabilitated) Act (XXVIII of 1958); Should approach settlement. For its distribution, the authorities should have determined from this authority whether the plot was divided or not, no evidence was presented by the plaintiff in support of the claim that the property in question was a deferred property, Therefore, it was deemed to be immovable. Property property, while non-divisible, could not be divided in terms of Sections 2-5. The Partition Act, 1893 Settlement Administration can specify and specify the shares of each party. The shares recognized, defined and delimited by the court are the shares granted by the Settlement Authority. No relief has been found in such circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from More kunda lawyer
