MUHAMMAD AYUB versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION LORA
Criminal Code of Criminal Procedure (CRPC) Articles 55/110 and 561 out of the processing records showed no evidence of a case being registered against the accused since 1980 while the complaint was registered in 1993 to 1969 The cases were filed on the basis of. Because of which he was outraged, therefore, he was not made in good faith and was tarnished with corruption, only two police officers were presented as witnesses in support of the complainant. Despite being summoned, he did not appear in court for evidence. The relevant area was cited as a witness to impose the accused's public reputation or the common allegations leveled against him, despite the complaint noting otherwise the magistrate's notice to show cause under section 1110 Prior to the issuance, the CCP did not comply with the required requirements. Section 112, order of the information received under CRPC, the order for the execution of the bond amount, the term for which the offender had to be retained and the member, role and surety guarantee required, As the proceedings were thwarted, the proceedings in the court magistrate against the accused continued, thus the court process would have to be misused. Accordingly, it was banned
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
