I.T.AS. NOS. 9825/LB OF 1992, 1140/LB AND 1328/LB OF 1996 vers — ask a lawyer free in Shahpur Chakar

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access

Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment

⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000

Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

I.T.AS. NOS. 9825/LB OF 1992, 1140/LB AND 1328/LB OF 1996 versus I.T.AS. NOS. 9825/LB OF 1992, 1140/LB AND 1328/LB OF 1996

Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Sections 132 (1) (d) and 66 Add to this add validity The IAC rejected the original assessment of the ITO because of incorrect and biased taxation. Order under section 66A of the Ordinance was based on assumptions, agreements and forecasts that were fully considered on the record material and facts maintained by the Assessing Officer under s 66A of the Ordinance in the circumstances. No justification was available.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer

Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad

ask a advocate free from Shahpur Chakar lawyer

Lawyers Directory Listing

Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

I.T.AS. NOS. 9825/LB OF 1992, 1140/LB AND 1328/LB OF 1996 versus I.T.AS. NOS. 9825/LB OF 1992, 1140/LB AND 1328/LB OF 1996

Find a Lawyer Near You