Find a Lawyer

MATLOOB HUSSAIN versus THE STATE

The confiscation of Articles 4 & 4 of the Criminal Code (CRPC) and bond 439 forced bond remains intact when the accused did not appear in the trial court on the four dates set forth in the case, though he was subsequently arrested, Shukase notes. In response, the petitioner (s), issued by the trial court, pleaded that since the accused was already arrested, he was released on bail and was not responsible for the absence of the accused on the dates before arrest. And upon entering it the respondent found himself on the following four dates on the basis of absence of attendance guarantee. Was obliged to appear in court or to contest the showcase notice properly, which would result in court proceedings. The penalty imposed on it by the trial court stated that the trial court's order was not illegal, patent or accidental, and did not demand interference. High court famous supreme court advocate from Faisalabad lawyer