Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BOOTA versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 (2) Prohibited (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Article 3/4 Narcotic Substances Ordinance (XIII of 1996), Section 9 Bail, Charges against the accused The approval was that it was selling marijuana and it recovered 525 grams of marijuana, but in the absence of expert opinion, it was not clear whether it was in fact \ Chars \ However, if eventually the suspect was \ The drug recovered was a drug addict, the drug articles were provided under Section 9 of the Ordinance, which did not fall under the prohibition clause, for maximum punishment. The seven-year guarantees in the crime. Field but in cases where further investigation was required to find out that the accused is being charged, a guarantee can be obtained in terms of section 497 (2), CCP Can be claimed in favor of, but it has not yet been determined whether the accused has been charged. Was committed by the accused, was heard by the special court under the control of the Narcotic Material Stances Ordinance 1996 or proceedings under the Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979, the defendant's case is one of further investigation. , Accordingly, bail was also admitted immigration advocates email from Patoki lawyer