ZULFIQAR AHMED versus PUNJAB PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
Arts 27, 25 and 199 Administrative Decision The Public Service Commission invites applications for the post of District Wildlife Officer for such post that is MC (Zoology) or BSc Forestry (Second) Division) were applicants who received a B.C. (Hons) Agriculture (Major Forest) Degree from the University of Agriculture, applied for the posts but their applications were rejected because they do not have the required qualifications, are accepted, the applicants have the qualifications. Is greater or less than the prescribed qualification. The government's case, however, was that the eligibility of the candidate depends on a fixed degree and not on the proportional rationale that rational government breaks down, thus failing to make the choice that the University Grants Commission has applied for. Degree earned by SC (Lions) Management of Forestry Boundaries and Wild Agar (Major) Qualifications were greater than BSc (Forest) and Equity grants were primarily the work of University Grants Commission, which qualifies It was legal to present, even though the vests in the government, yet denied the opportunity to compete in the election of those who had the equal qualification certificate is clearly a violation of Articles 27 and 25 of the Constitution. Where any candidate has a qualification that is considered equal by a specialist legal organization, the government can influence it. Will not have the power to refuse. The administration of the council representing the government accepted the decision simply because of administrative inconvenience.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Skardu lawyer