Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MIAN MUHAMMAD HANIF versus THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION CITY DEPALPUR,\' DISTRICT OKARA


Article 324/452/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition In the challan case, the FIR trial is underway and two witnesses have been examined, making any comment on the merits of this case. Was. Not required because this trial can be biased. The prosecution had evidence to support the version listed in the FIR, and they also collected appropriate evidence, such as recovery of the vacancy and the weapons used during the trial, so they were capable of judicial decision. There was no need to halt trial criminal proceedings because the subject of both incidents was separate. There was no good ground available to stop the FIR. Constitutional application was dismissed.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
pakistani advocates More kunda lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.