Find a Lawyer

WALI ULLAH KHAN versus STATE

The definition of evidence of the Customs General Order 1986 section 156 (1) (8) of 1986 was a matter relating to the possession of the suitcase that the heroin allegedly recovered from was disputed because the accused simultaneously made the same requirement. What was the challenge The circumstances to protect the independent counselors who occupy the said briefcase cannot be transferred because the very identity of this suitcase was disputed by the accused, other than the notice under Section 171 of the Customs Act 1969, which by itself was suspected, no. And no document can link the accused to the suitcase case, the prosecution also failed to comply with the Customs General Order No. 12 of 1986; the procedure for storing / sampling the seized heroin was suggested on 31st 31st 1986. , The suspect was acquitted on suspicion of circumstances. how to become a advocate from Makran lawyer