The complainant of the Pakistan Penal Code Section 392 testimony provided details of the incidents in his house, but after the arrest of the accused, the accused was not identified with a delay of nine days in conducting the identification parade. The prosecuting magistrate who supervised the identification parade did not identify the investigating counselor who admitted that the suspect was shown to the police station and then went to the police for an identification test, Therefore, no evidence was available. The accused was acquitted under circumstances to link the accused to the commission of the crime
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
