Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKHTAR versus RAZIA BEGUM

CPC Appearance and Non-Presidential Results of Civil Procedure Code Order IX O IX, R 9, Proviso [As Registered by the Peshawar High Court No. 2212G, dated 12 5 1909] Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) In the case of OIX, R8, CPC, dismissing the mortgage suit dismissed by the trial court appeals court on the same reason for the same relief dismissed earlier. The trial court's decision to dismiss the trial court affirmed by the High Court affirming the merit, the appellate court's validity was identified and the court's finding here detected Based on the provisions of OIC's C9, the CPC [which the Peshawar High Court has amended] provided that the plaintiff be barred from bringing anyone else. The lawsuit for the recovery of the mortgage, although its previous case was excluded by default, although both courts below have ruled that the plaintiff's latest case is barred under OI, R9. No, the request to restore the CPC has been dropped. Excluding or dismissing an appeal against it, it has been said that no legal change has been made. The latest lawsuit on mortgage withdrawal will be subject to the terms of the OIX, R9, CPC, there is no error in the High Court decision which has allowed them to be discharged. Appeal denied ask a advocate free from Kacha Khooh lawyer