Find a Lawyer

MUJAHID HUSSAIN versus FATEH BEVI

Claimant's Claim of Specific Land Based on Civil Procedure Code Order VIII and O. VIII, R 2, Sections 12 (2) and 11 Land Reform Regulations, 1972 (MLR 115), paragraph 24 (5) of the CPC I did not deny the consent decree by the defendants, so the defendants were not asked to prove such decree, however, the validation of the decree was challenged but such issue was addressed to them. Under Section 12 (2), the CPC challenged the petition and dismissed such request and was no longer challenged, the final status quo was obtained, therefore, for the new case. Such provocations cannot be repeated on request by the media. Such a matter stands between the parties and has been subjected to judicial principles of justice. best advocate from Rohri lawyer