Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

KARAM ALI versus GHULAM ALI


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 540 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/148/149 As part of the prosecution, the police officer was partially investigating the matter, so a police officer's proof was necessary. ? The plea was made earlier during the trial and the state did not close the case before bringing the required evidence in the same prosecution record. Besides, the trial court also summoned another police officer as a prosecution witness. Was the proof of which was considered. Necessary, but they refused to call the aforementioned police officer on the ground that the evidence was not admissible. The trial court's ruling of Syed was neither lawful nor appropriate, and accordingly, the application for arbitration review was excluded within that boundary [witness].

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Tarmatan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.