The testimony of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965, the testimony of collection of evidence was false and there was good reason not to be available at the time of recovery, besides the presence of several persons in the area of recovery was not free and the unwanted persons. Even the temporary possession of firearms by the suspects by its licensors cannot be considered a possession under section 13 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965. I was declared involved and eventually sentenced. The suspect was acquitted in the main because of the dishonest investigation of the police officer
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
