MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ versus ALLAH YAR
Section 42 of the Government42 Government Colonial Act of Punjab (v. 1912), section 19 for the declaration and permanent injunction which became the owner of the land under question on the basis of the plaintiff's oral sale and the defendant in the possession of the plaintiff. Intervention will be banned. The trial court rejected, but the appellate court ruled that the delivery of possession in favor of the plaintiff was also recordable since the effect of the sale was obtained between the parties. The case was, therefore, the case because the declaration was in accordance with the law and within the limits the plaintiff had successfully established that the record, with the required permission of the collector under Section 19, the Government Land Colonization (Punjab) Act, 1912. The sale of the land is in his favor. , With the fact that the possession of the underground land was also conveyed to the appellate court, did not constitute any illegal determination to find the trial court and declare the claim of the plaintiff.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer