MUHAMMAD NAEEM versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL
Testimonies of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 and 307 were neither examined by the witnesses nor by the trial court on separate affirmation, but the separate court recorded the evidence in both cross-cases but without discussing each of the witnesses. They were settled by a single legally binding decision. Their own credibility was tested by the trial court in the confusion of the facts of each case or otherwise, and to rule out the possibility of an armed conflict between the parties in the future that could potentially lead to further casualties, Was saved from the loss of lives. Their release and reassurance from both sides followed a path to ensure future peace, which according to them could also be a means of preventing the parties from taking the law into their hands. Both incidents were charged. The trial judge's stated sincere view that in both cases we were affected by the external circumstances was once again separated and he was sent to another Additional Sessions Judge for judgment in accordance with law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Kotla Arab Ali Khan lawyer