Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

AFZAL KHAN versus THE STATE


The prosecution witnesses, excluding the Pakistan Penal Code Section 457/34 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), section 342, were exempt from their statements under sections 161 and 164, CR PC in the case, and on each other on material points. Had a controversial trial from. The two eyewitnesses of the tender age had not raised any question to satisfy themselves about their ability to testify, nor had they given any certificate to that effect, the defendant jointly under 34 342 Cr. Was investigated, which made the case unsuccessful and there was no compelling evidence. They were thrown out of the suspect's crime weapon was not recovered by the prosecution only the independent witness of the incident was released.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Samma Satta lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.