Find a Lawyer

GHULAM ABBAS BOKHARI versus GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 199 Constitutional jurisdiction, the claimant on the legal status of the possession of the property claimed for more than a quarter the protection of his occupation, which was allegedly allotted as a public servant, but later I had his allotment canceled by his name and he was allotted. The respondent petitioner alleged that the order canceling his allotment was a fake and pre-date and that the respondents had obtained the allotment by hiding the facts, alleging that the order for canceling his allotment was dated and It was fabricated, it could not be accepted only on the basis of Ganji's claim that it was a question of fact and could be resolved only by recording evidence, which was not possible in the constitutional pleadings. In the case was regularly associated with orders approved by the public workers, in the dispute Compel the High to take possession of it and a person who has a fly in the allotment n The cancellation, protection of the occupant of the applicant whose allotment has been canceled, would be equivalent to working with the help of injustice which is possible under the law. During the quarter in the dispute, the applicant's authority is unauthorized; he was not entitled to arbitrary constitutional relief by the High Court, nor did he have any legal title or interest in retaining possession of the quarters in the dispute. Is property advocate from Amangarh lawyer