Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MASOOD-UR-REHMAN versus STATE


Definition of Section 2 ???2 (b) and evidencereation evidence Each of the accused was entitled to treat all the accused equally, without having to prove the evidence, did not cause to be convicted in the case of suspicious evidence alone. Especially when the two convicted accused were in government. Employees and no police officers went on their own duty. The proper purpose of involvement of the accused was that the presence of the complaining party on the occasion was very doubtful and if they were present at all they would not have described the incident in this manner. What was The suspects were acquitted on the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances in which it happened and tried to combine the two stories into one.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top civil advocates from Farooqabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.