Find a Lawyer

HOHNSON AND PHILLIPS (PAKISTAN) LTD. versus MUHAMMAD AYAZ

Sections 2 (a), 34 and 39 of the Arbitration Act 1940, IX of 1872 (Section IX of 1872), Article 29 provide for a written agreement for the establishment of proceedings in civil suits and for reference to the subject matter of dispute in a civil suit for arbitration. For the arbitration or future dispute must be present, such dispute was only a party to the arbitration agreement or a claimant acting under any party under either party. An application under section 34 should be made before filing a written statement or taking further steps. The nature of the dispute to be referred to in the proceedings must be stated or explained by the arbitration agreement. There should be a clarification of the scope of the dispute which the parties agreed to refer to the arbitration agreement, which was indefinitely, ambiguous, uncertain: indefinitely or indefinitely. Any dispute between the parties regarding the arbitration. Cannot explain what the disputes are The matter related to arbitration in the agreement was uncertain, meaningless and ambiguous, the arbitration agreement was not at all, the arbitration clause was not vague at trial. To move the petition under Section 34, Arbitration Act, 1940 famous lower court advocate from Khair Pur Mir lawyer