JALALUDDIN versus STATE
Criminal fornication (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 16 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 342 In its statement under testimony 164, the abductor, CRPC, has not charged any accused of rape or rape against the accused. What was There was also evidence on record to link the accused to the crime. The Sessions Court had condemned the accused by formulating some questions while recording the verdict and instead of filing a case under section 2342, CCP Accepting the invalid part of the trial court was fully worked against the law by rejecting the statement and excuse section under Section 234 Cr, CRPC, the accused had the benefit of the doubt in the circumstances. Was acquitted on.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Mari Indus lawyer
