Find a Lawyer

RAZIA GILL versus LEELA

Sections 15, 19 and 21 of the Transfer Property Act, (IV I 1882), section 52, were ordered to issue a writ of ownership, declaring the previous withdrawal order illegal, on which the writ of possession was issued, He claimed. Since it had sold the property in dispute and formed a third-party interested in the property in dispute, any order passed in the appeal against the issuance of a writ of possession would affect the third party, After the sale of the property the possession was acquired and the appeal became obsolete. The dispute, which was able to be excluded on the ground, was canceled because the property transfer in the dispute during litigation has been subjected to the principles set out in section 222 of the property, so the law Infringement will not prevent third party interests from being created. The court, seeking the relief of the third party against the proper order in favor of the party against which the writ of possession was issued, was to seek relief for the third party against whom the writ of possession was issued. best advocate from Toru lawyer