MUHAMMAD SALEEM versus ZAFARUL HAQ BAIG
Ordinance 1975 Section 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the vacant property and homelessness law, in the interest of the applicants, the information presented by the defendant in advance of the allocation of underground land Canceled on request. The High Court directed that the land should be sold to the applicants to the extent of their entitlement, while the rest of the land should be allotted to the respondents. (Mukhtar) Some part of the land was allotted to the respondents while the remaining applications were directed by the High Court. Were sold to applicants. As a result of the litigation, the High Court found that after the High Court's remand order, the applicants were allotted the proper place. No valid reasons for accuracy were found to be inconsistent with the High Court High Court's finding, however, that the order after the constitutional petition was forbidden. Earlier, the BN High Court had approved the constitutional petition by the High Court. After the constitutional petition, issue a decree that if the respondents were allotted land in their favor, the Chief Settlement Commissioner would be the only one to take up the matter. Can check, no legal weakness was identified in the order question, the High Court's leave was denied in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Kotmomin lawyer