Find a Lawyer

SAINDAD versus PROVINCE OF SINDH

Limitation Act 1908 Article 144 Negative Occupancy Case The plaintiff failed to request a claim for possession of the land by the negative possession of the plaintiff due to want of particulars and particulars of the substance in the case, and the payment of the land revenue. And was in possession of the original documents relating to the land and was acquired by the plaintiff under the law of the land but his face did not reflect the claim of negative possession, which had to be opened. ? In his case about the knowledge of every person, including the plaintiff, special, uninterrupted, notorious and true owner, the plaintiff did not say against whom he had obtained this honor by taking possession of open, active, exclusive and contemptuous land. ? Establish his negative possession claim through evidence. The material on the record indicates that the defendant's occupation was not negative but not permitted advocate for immigration from Sagri lawyer