The evidence of the prosecution of Section 13D evidence of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 was not a material contradiction The defense was not permanent in its position Kalashnikov was recovered from the suspects, but was not sealed after his capture. Was identified and numbered regularly in the Advisory Manual and the FIR, which was prepared at the time of its recovery, was identified and identified by such marks and numbers under Section 13D of the Arms Ordinance. , Was retained when the accused was found guilty. With a substantial reduction in their punishment
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
