MUHAMMAD AMIN versus THE STATE
After examining and deliberating the section 302/34, the FIR was registered and the eyewitnesses related to the deceased had improved the case by separating from the FIR and were registered in the police prosecution case. 'S first statements were full. Suspicions and incidents were revealed, and the father of the accused and his offender were harassed and put on the matter. Ocular evidence contradicts Meadow's legal report, the suspect is 15 years old, his alleged fugitive is of no use if proven, because, as a teenager, he imagines the effects and consequences of his fugitive impact. Could not, but could have been under the influence of his elders, otherwise the father's father's fugitive was not taken into account. , Could not be used against him to constitute a base for his conviction. During the trial, the motive was set, which was uncertain whether the accused was acquitted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Hassan Abdal lawyer