TAHIR MAHMOOD versus SECRETARY, BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, LAHORE
After receiving the report from the Punjab Civil Servants (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1975 Rr 7 A & 8 D Novo Inquiry Inquiry Officer, the competent government officer will have to determine if the accused has been proved against a public servant. Or not, authorized officers can apply in case of positive results. After providing the opportunity to show cause against the proposed action, the accused imposed a minor fine on the civil servant if the competent government official felt that the accused had to pay a heavy fine on the civil servant, so he could deal with his recommendation. The authority had to be sent because the authorized government officer had it. In this case, de novo is not authorized to order an inquiry, but under any provision under section 8 of the Punjab Civil Servants (Qualification and Discipline) Rules 1975, the authority to order a de novo inquiry is expressly, Even if the authorized officer recommends action. Against the accused public servant, the authority may still order a DU probe against the accused civil survey NT, keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the matter.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
