Find a Lawyer

AL-SEHAT (PVT.) LTD. ISLAMIC MISSION, SHIKARPUR (SINDH) versus NATIONAL COUNCIL OF HOMOEOPATHY

Greek, Ayurvedic and Homeopathic Practitioners Act 1965 Section 37 A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application was approved by the Federal Government through the Federal Government on 16 February 1986 in the name of the College, in which applicants and Respondent is running. And in that way it was claimed that the original college was running which it was recognized that the responsible citizen claimed that it was the college which was approved by the federal government. , Therefore, the response was rejected because the defendant's title was defective in his case. A permanent injunction could not be established and that the respondents should have filed a case against the respondent's appeal against the dismissal of the contract, he filed a case for the declaration in which the applicant was a party. As such, but such a request was denied and the defendant's case was rejected by the applicant's appeal against the decision. The INP Petition subsequently filed its orders against the National Council of Homeopathy. Filed a constitutional petition against the challenge, whereby the college's respondents were identified as real college persons. What was found was that rival Yum College of respondents who had not joined as a plaintiff in the case, the respondent was appointed principal of the college. He was one of the claimants in the former claimant college who did not file a case for declaration, the respondent his employee having the right to retain any kind of claim for the declaration to run any college himself. Can't claim, because of its ability immigration advocates phone number from Mangal Sada lawyer