MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ versus AL HAIDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
The appearance and absence of the parties to the Civil Procedure Code Order IX of the CPC resulted in the ex parte decree under O IX, R 13 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 164 26 198 1986 in which the ex parte decree The petition for separation was filed 11 11 1986, which was banned under section 164, the Limitation Act, 1908, the application for separation of the former party decree was filed within thirty days from 26 8 1986. Should have been the case when the former party was sued for separation. The decree was dismissed on 5 5 1987, the defendants filed an appeal against the dismissal of their petition, the former party order was dismissed on 1 8 1987, which was returned to the appellant that the appellate court thereafter. There was no jurisdiction after which an appeal was filed on 3 11 in the High Court. Appeals filed by the defendant were restricted at the time of the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Dina lawyer
