Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ versus AL HAIDER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY


The appearance and absence of the parties to the Civil Procedure Code Order IX of the CPC resulted in the ex parte decree under O IX, R 13 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Article 164 26 198 1986 in which the ex parte decree The petition for separation was filed 11 11 1986, which was banned under section 164, the Limitation Act, 1908, the application for separation of the former party decree was filed within thirty days from 26 8 1986. Should have been the case when the former party was sued for separation. The decree was dismissed on 5 5 1987, the defendants filed an appeal against the dismissal of their petition, the former party order was dismissed on 1 8 1987, which was returned to the appellant that the appellate court thereafter. There was no jurisdiction after which an appeal was filed on 3 11 in the High Court. Appeals filed by the defendant were restricted at the time of the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
advocate from Sehwan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.