Find a Lawyer

RANA RIAZ AHMAD versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Sections 14, 5 and 6 of the Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 555 The police report of a prosecution did not show that the applicant was involved in any of the four cases against him. He has also been convicted, but was acquitted in a case and the action against him was established under the $ 107/151 police record nearly four years ago, thus giving the petitioner a copy of the Sindh Crimes Control Act of 1975. The habit was not shown to be the culprit. The details of the offenses committed by the applicant with the time and place and other important features were not brought to the notice of the magistrate, nor were they complied with Sections 5 and 6 of the said Act, complying with the particulars required by law Is gone The pending proceedings against the applicant under Section 14 of the Sindh Crimes Control Act 1975 were not submitted in the police report, PCLL J 2499 of 1993 was dismissed under the circumstances. 1992 PCRL J2248; 1993 PCRL J455 and 1993 PCRL J1378 Rail best law firms from Sakardu lawyer