MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus AZIZ AHMED KHAN
Section 15 of the Contract Act (IX of 1872), the primary reliance of the tenant on the tenant was for the landlord to compel him not to sell the property in question to another person and in this case I was considering that sale. Such measures did not show what the tenants would prefer, and it should be speculated that such an acquisition was held in breach, thus such acquisition was void. Shall be deemed, in addition, that no one may contract with the rights granted under it. Taking any law-based measures, even if implemented by the former owner of the premises, will have no legal effect.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Hazro lawyer
