GUT SANGA (MISS) versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, PESHAWAR
CHAP XXVIII, Paris 36 and 40 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 4 and 1991 Constitutional Secondary School Certificate Examination Petitioner has a total test / re-examination of his marks in connection with two papers, namely General Mathematics. To check. The paper of the General Science Petitioner of General Science was found with double marking on which it was given marks awarded marks in the initial marking of all Examiners while the Head Examiner had reduced its marks to 68 marks which were made by the Head. Examiner didn't even have the option. In order to increase or decrease the numbers (in terms of the paragraph of the calendar) any response paper is assigned by the Sub-Examiner, in case of a difference between the Head Auditor and the Sub Examiner, the case Chairman, Intermediate and Secondary Must be sent to the Board of Education which will either appoint the third examiner whose award is final, or send the matter to the Committee for Courses which will be subject to final approval. The Chairman Head Examiner was empowered to review, in addition to the usual test installment on the 1/1/1% of the respondents' books marked by all examiners in terms of paragraph 40 of the calendar, and all Examiners In the event of a disagreement with, the matter had to be dealt with accordingly. With the rules / procedures included in the calendar authority's rules which did not comply with the rules / procedures, its process was unusual and accordingly it was directed to the authority Allot the applicant (77 (original number) in the science paper) and make necessary corrections to his record in this regard.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
