PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus KHURSHEED FATIMA
Employee of West Pakistan Government (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1960 R 4 Civil Procedure (v. 1908), dismissed from employment for misconduct by authority authorized to behave in sections 9 and 100, dismissed by a government employee. He was challenged by civil servants in a civil suit by the Department of Justice. The trial of a civil servant was heard by the trial court, which appealed before the civil court to decide the matter by the appellant. Authentication was maintained in the jurisdiction of the competent authority approved the removal of 15-1 1962 The Department of Appeal was dismissed on 1 5 1969, and both orders were approved before the target date ie, 1969, the appeal was not appealed against the disapproval orders before the Administrative Tribunal. The trial did not diminish, which could have proceeded against unclean orders; the courts below had properly heard and disposed of the merit, the first appeal against the trial decision and the second appeal could be heard on merits and the district. Can be dealt with by the Court and the High Court. Respectively
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Qazi Ahmed lawyer