Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

IFTIKHAR AHMED versus CONTINENTAL BEVERAGES PVT. LTD.


Civil Procedure Code Order VII, R11 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Arts 58 and 59 of CPC Plants O VII, application for dismissal of the plaintiff due to the defendant's limitation on receipt of money It was first shown that when a demand for a refund was made on December 31, 1992 and thereafter on 31st 1993, the suit would not be considered a restriction by law, because the plaintiffs under OVII, R 11, CPC. In order to reject, the contents of the plaintiff were required to acknowledge their importance, which, regardless of the merits of the parties' prejudice disputes, was rejected by the plaintiff. S request that the case was dismissed with the observation limits should be fixed with the facts of the matter.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous supreme court advocate from Wazirabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.