Find a Lawyer

SOHAIL JUTE MILLS (PVT.) LTD., RAWALPINDI versus CENTRAL BOARD OF REVENUE, C.B.R., ISLAMABAD

Constitution Pakistan 1973 Article 19 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application Exemption on import of raw jet materials, return of imported goods immunity claim that the defendant (CBR) has no right to recover these amounts. Who were previously exempt during the period of immunity. The reason for the notification was acknowledged in the High Court's jurisdiction in the proceedings of the petitioner where the tax and duties were assessed by a legal practitioner who was jurisdictional of the High Court at \ L I was not enforced in the constitutional petition filed simply because the applicant was. In the territorial jurisdiction of the High Court at Court L, it was not enough to give the resident or his territorial jurisdiction to the court the question when the bill was submitted on the question K question of the jurisdiction of the High Court. Matters were entered. Under the orders of the competent authority in the auditorium and duties were assessed, the customs officials assessed the customs duty and were independent workers under the Customs Act 1969 and who worked under the jurisdiction of the law. The person who created them was not implemented in the constitutional petition where unauthorized officials took action. The fact that their orders were granted in the petition is a fact that the court, the headquarters of the Central Board of Revenue, does not give jurisdiction to the High Court under section 199 (1) (a). Will i) 8 (ii) In High Constitution of the Constitution, the court shall direct the person working in the territorial jurisdiction of the High Court to issue instructions to the Collector Customs at Collector K at advocate from Okara lawyer