Section 12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 suit was rejected by trial court for specific performance of sale contract High court rejected trial court's decision and the plaintiff of same authenticity admitted to receiving substantial amount But because the plaintiff's attempt to explain was leased to the plaintiff's claim, the monopoly was leased to the claimant's claim and the sale agreement between him and the claimant was then terminated. And later it could not be confirmed by any document while the defendant acknowledged receipt of the money and said that the lease amount Failed to give the adjustment period for which to be adjusted, especially the contents of the contract of sale relating to the facts of the contract were acknowledged by the defendant although he claimed that these later mutual arrangements Was terminated by, however, the contract remained unstable even if the sale was ignored due to the failure to prove the defendant's signature of the contract, however, the fact of the sale price Will not affect the search recorded by the High Court in relation to and has been amended, as the plaintiff Has been claimed by him that he was selling by funds offered by the claimant failed to prove. Price and not lease money
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
