NAZAR MUHAMAMAD versus THE STATE
Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) Guarantee Section 497 (1), Third Proviso Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/148/149/109/120 B Delay of Legal Bail All the eleven co-accused were acquitted by the Special Tribunal of Special Trials and the State's appeal against their success was also dismissed by the Supreme Appeal Court for Speedy Trials and the prosecution of the accused. The accused was not yet in sight. There was no evidence of previous convictions or hardships, disappointments or dangerous offenders or involvement in terrorism, it was found to have a legal right to extend bail which could not be denied because it was superior to the law. Such a condition / restriction was imposed on the accused in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Bhara Kahu lawyer
