GULISTAN TEXTILE MILLS LTD., BAHAWALPUR versus MEMBER (CONSOLIDATION), BOARD OF REVENUE/CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB,LAHORE
Sections 347, 350 and 439 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 242424 / S 34 The Sessions Court, upon receiving a case from a court magistrate under section 7347, approved the order of the de novo trial on the statements. Although the complainant's lawyer did not seriously oppose the request for a de novo trial by the defense lawyer, the session court had a duty to determine whether the de novo trial was allowed in this case. Under the law or in the interest of justice, the Sessions Court approved the impeachment order of the de novo trial without exercising its judicial mind and in keeping with the legal requirements of the law, which allowed it to proceed with the trial on the current record. Given the option of. If the evidence was already validly recorded by the magistrate at trial, the order to hold the Sessions Court's De Nova trial was disputed, in which case no cause of prejudice was shown with the accused. ? It was seriously set aside and the magistrate directed to proceed to the trial from the point of sending the matter.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
