MAHMOOD KHAN ACHAKZAI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 184 and 199 [as amended by the Constitution (Eighth Amendment) Act (XVIII of 1985]], the jurisdiction and the jurisdiction of judicial review in relation to the jurisdiction of the High Courts is that the judges of the High Courts designate Sworn under the amended constitution (By the Constitution (Eighth Amendment) Act, 1985) and those who were receiving periodic salaries could not abolish the Constitution Amendment (Constitution (Eighth Amendment) Act, 1985), such restrictions were imposed. The authority of the judicial review of the High Courts or of a court was without legal basis and the jurisdiction and jurisdiction of the judicial review could not be restrained on this basis and the judges of the high courts took the oath to defend, protect and protect the Constitution. Illegal is the constitution was amended or amended, the courts were able to investigate and interpret to reconcile its provision. In which the inferior rights would be to obtain the higher rights, the salary paid to the judges was not a favor or favor, it was a constitutional duty to provide the judges with salaries and benefits through which the independence of the judiciary was guaranteed by the courts. To prevent any illegal and unlawful action. Delivering or interpreting the Constitution is the defense, protection and protection of the Constitution
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Hub Inds Estate lawyer