KARIM BAKHSH versus ZULFIQAR
Section 2?2 (b) /, 34, 4 324 / & Pakistan and 2 452 // 34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 Remand of the case by the High Court for the latest trial, dissatisfaction with the inquiry into the complaint. And the challan, which was submitted by the police, was registered in a private complaint on the same allegations that he had mentioned in the FIR in which he named the four attackers as the accused trial court sentenced all the accused. 302 (b) / 34, 324/34 and 452/34, were sentenced under PPC, but the Supreme Court, while keeping the same aside in the appeal filed by the accused, got the case remanded for the latest trial. CYNDI WANG LOVES YOU DOWNLOAD There was no need for a separate case as the FIR was the same, along with the accused and the accused in the complaint. As a result, the High Court was set aside and the case was returned to the High Court for judgment on merit.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Karore Lalisan lawyer
