Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AHSAN-UL-HAQ versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF INTERIOR, ISLAMABAD

Federal Investigation Agency (Appointment, Promotion and Transfer) Rules 1975 Schedule 1 Federal Investigation Agency Act (VIII of 1975), Proposed Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 212 Public Employees Promotion Committee for further publicity of public servants Considered the issue of promotion of a public servant twice, the public servant was not found to be able to develop on the first occasion, and on the second occasion, he was dismissed despite the fact that the publicity committee was dismissed. The content remained the same at both meetings of government employees. There were no negative comments on his record that once the dismissal of a civil servant whose service was terminated by the tribunal could not be allowed to suffer throughout his career when his next juniors were called to the Departmental Promotion Committee. Determining progress was made in the subsequent history of the High Court jurisdiction not in accordance with its earlier determination, in the way of the civil servant for the postponement of a public servant constituted under Article 212 of the Constitution. Will not be challenged in front of the Tribunal Grounds, which will be supported by the Department Development Committee Was considered. According to the record, it can be safely asserted that the issue of public servants was not considered at all in accordance with the law orders approved by the Public Promotion Committee, which initially delayed the development of a public servant. Was fired and then fired and that was the case. According to the law, the Departmental Promotion Committee was sent for fresh consideration property advocate from Chaininda lawyer