Find a Lawyer

AHMAD YAR versus THE STATE

The conviction of the PPC was punished and the accused was punished under the evidence for not being covered under the provisions of section 303 (a). The enmity between the parties was intended to escalate the prosecution case, there was no benefit to recover the licensed gun from the accused, medical evidence created a serious possibility of the one shot dead. Was prevented. The presence of a witness in the event of any conclusions reached a particular conclusion to confirm the above-mentioned shot was highly suspicious, which cannot be relied upon without the independent cooperation of the complainant's testimony, which is listed under section 342 The accused's statements were lacking. CR PC that was left in the field, so. They should be fully acknowledged, which shows that at the time of the incident, an accused was fired only in self-defense, whose rights could not be taken in gold scales so as to determine their responsibility. can go. The suspects were acquitted following a police investigation: immigration advocates from Hangu lawyer