TAYUBA FAROOQI versus PARIME MINISTER OF PAKISTAN
Civil Servants Act 1973 Section 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Seniority Development Government Employees ?? Respondents' appeal for superannuation was dismissed. It was conceded that the defendants were eligible for promotion. And they were senior to the applicants. Employees at the Civil Grade Service Tribunal rightly refused to interfere with such promotions that, according to the Supreme Court's observation, it was advised for the department that each Create equal and equal percentages of the class, so as not to deprive the person deserving of development. Thanks for sharing for further progress. Such observations will not eliminate the publicity of the respondents as per the relevant rules. The Supreme Court, however, believes that the Department will not examine relevant Service Tribunal observations and take corrective action in accordance with the law, which was allowed in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Ghotki lawyer