Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RASHID versus MUHAMMAD HALEEM

Inappropriate brain OXXXII, R7 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the suit processor code order XXII CPC suit is claimed to declare that he personally Owns the house The decision was made on the basis of the report of the local commissioner's trial court, while the CPC issued an order relying on the statements of the parties listed on the date specified in the interest of the respondents who filed the petition under section 12 (2). According to which this order was received. In this way of fraud and misrepresentation, the plea was rejected by all the courts below the record, including a test of the accuracy of the High Court in which some parties were minor, in the history of the decree of settlement, the record added that the trial proceeded. During the trial, the court did not decide. The provisions contained in the provisions of OXXXII, R7, OXXXI, R 7, CPC shall, in nature, be construed as CPC. Appeal leave was allowed to consider the effect of non-compliance with this provision after all other parties except minors were void. immigration advocate from Faisalabad lawyer