ATTA ULLAH versus LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY TRIBUNAL
Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 48 Lakshi Penitentiary, Implementation Principle The fresh acquisition proceedings were initiated on the basis of the agreement of the parties by notification of the date issued under Section 48, Land Acquisition Act, 1894, after which the new acquisition. The action could not be undone. The agreement was contracted between the appellant and the authorities against the agreement which resulted in the appellant to be given a fair plot of equal value in return for the acquisition of his property, thus the latest acquisition proceedings, unilaterally. Could not be withdrawn and for the appellant the rule of the Luxury Possession was in full force, they could not be deprived of the valuable right which it had acquired, and thereafter, the withdrawal of the notification for fresh acquisition proceedings. Thus, it was declared without legal authority and had no legal effect.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
when you need a advocate from Nankana Sahib lawyer