Find a Lawyer

SALEHOON versus NAZIR AHMAD

Section 6 and 13 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1991 and the pre-emption order passed in Punjab Pre-Emission Act (Constitution of 1913), Section 15 Suite 212 1977, were adopted under 21 197 1978, separating the ex parte decree There was also an appeal against the ruling. Thus, on the 14th 1978 1978 the previous order was rejected, absent and its status was restored as the former party was not in the field on 1 8 1986, SCMR established in 1992 in the case of Bahadur Khan. 2117 was not attracted, and for this reason the plaintiff's case was covered and the decision was to be made in accordance with the provisions of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991, wherein the formerly pursuant to Section 6 of the Disciplinary Treaty Sharaq, Shafi Khayyat, and Shafi Jar were granted pre-copyright rights. The provisions of section 13 of the Act, 1991, the students need to be sued under the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991, the conditions laid down in sections 6 and 13 have been fulfilled, thus the trial court was correct, the trial of the plaintiff. Was not appropriate Canta incompetent best advocate from Mailsi lawyer