Supreme Court India — Judgments of 1956
32 reported judgments of the Supreme Court India from 1956.
- HARI VISHNU KAMATH v. SYED AHMAD ISHAQUE 1956 PLD 1
Government of India Act 1935 Constitution of India, Article 226 (Adopted in accordance with Government of India Act, 1935 Section 223A Pakistan) Writes Certificate after becoming High Court Facts Offi…
- SURAJPAL v. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH 1956 PLD 21
Section 236 and 237 of the Criminal Code applied to the accused by the Appellate Court under Trial Sections 302 and 307 of the Pakistan Penal Code Pedal Code (XLV of 1860) under section 149 charges an…
- KIRAN SINGH v. CHAMAN PASWAN 1956 PLD 38
The Suit Valuation Act 1887 The Suit Valuation Act (VII of 1887) Section 11, whether a decree passed by a competent court on the basis of absolute prejudice is a mere suit under section 11 of the Suit…
- ANANDA BEHERA v. STATE OF ORISSA 1956 PLD 49
General Clause Act 1897 (a) General Clause Act (X9 of 1897) Section 3 (26) The right to catch and take a fish from a lake, whether a real estate property or an oral sale of this right for a price grea…
- K. N. GURUSWAMY v. THE STAT OF MYSORE 1956 PLD 53
Article 226 of the Constitution of India (adapted to Government of India Act, 1935, S: 223A as per Pakistan) mandamus was written by a Government servant to cancel the sale of any advertisement entere…
- PRABHU BABAJI NAVLE v. STATE OF BOMBAY 1956 PLD 59
Under section 302 and 34, section 302 and 34, several defendants read with section 34 of the conviction when all but one was convicted, regardless of the Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898). Section 510…
- BRAJNANDAN SINHA v. JYOTI NARAIN 1956 PLD 65
Courts contempt of court Act 1926 (Section 3) Courts contempt of court Act (XII of 1926) (as amended in Pakistan), appointed as Commissioner under the Public Servants Court (Inquiries) Act (XXXVII of …
- CENTRAL, BANK OF INDIA v. RAM NARAIN 1956 PLD 81
Pakistan Penal Code Penal Code (XLV of 1860) Section 4 A crime committed by an individual while not a citizen of that country when a trial is held, whether it is the Legal Criminal Code (V9 1898), Sec…
- U. J. S. CHOPRA v. STATE OF BOMBAY 1956 PLD 89
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898) Sections 439, and 369 on a review petition filed by the government to show cause against the increase in conviction were issued befor…
- R. M. SESHADRI v. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, TANJORE 1956 PLD 145
Constitution of India Constitution of India Article 19 (1) (g) (Constitution of Pakistan, Article 12 (1)) Cinema Graphs Act (III 1918), Section 8 Permanent Cinema Theater Owners have been granted cond…
- SAGHIR AHMAD v. THE STATE OF U. P 1956 PLD 148
Articles 14, 19 (1), (6), 31 (2) and 301 (Constitution of Pakistan Articles 12 (a) and 15 (1) and (2)) relating to the Constitution of India, whether an act confers exclusive rights Have been Run road…
- DHAKESWARI COTTON MILLS, LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, WEST BENGAL 1956 PLD 168
Constitution of India India Article Article 136 (Constitution of Pakistan, Article 160) Appeals to the Supreme Court by special leave of the court whether it is limited to the violation of the rules o…
- PANDURANG, TUKIA AND BHILLIA v. THE STATE OF HYDERABAD 1956 PLD 176
Pakistan Penal Code The Penal Code (XLV of 1860) Article 34 whether the joint intention is a joint intention.…
- NATHU v. STATE OF UTTAR PIADESH 1956 PLD 186
Evidence Act (I of 1872), after prolonged police detention, confessed to Section 3 and 30 co-accused of appropriate evidence of the Enchantment Heavy Act (I of 1872) in the absence of a proper explana…
- AMRIK SINGH v. THE STATE OF PEPSU 1956 PLD 191
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898) Section 197 (1) The prosecution's approval is necessary when section 197 (1) is required, when a government employee may have claimed…
- PREM NATH v. THE STATE OF DELHI 1956 PLD 197
Criminal Procedure Code (CR PC) Section 309 of the Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898) It is punishable or unlawful to review the reviewer in relation to all charges…
- PANGAMBAM KALANJOY SINGH v. THE STATE OF MANIPUR 1956 PLD 205
Evidence Act 1872 Section 24 of the Evidence Act (I of 1872) Whether a confession is a crime is necessary for a confession offense, if the confession is made as early as possible, the magistrate must …
- WAZIR CHAND v. THE STATE OF HIMACHAL PRADESH 1956 PLD 210
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898) Sections 51, 96, 98, 165 and 523 of the Constitution of India, Articles 19, 31 and 226 (Constitution of Pakistan Articles 11, 12, 15…
- TOPANDAS v. THE STATE OF BOMBAY 1956 PLD 215
Pakistan Penal Code Penal Code (XLV of 1860) Sections 120A & 120B Many accused, if any, can be punished for wrongdoing…
- MERLA RAMANNA v. NALLAPARAJU 1956 PLD 220
Limitation Act 1908 Limitation Act (IX of 1908) Articles 163, 166 and 181 apply for limitation on the acquisition of possession by the lender of a wrongful sale decision whether Article 166 or 181 app…
- JAYARAM VITHOBA v. THE STATE OF BOMBAY 1956 PLD 243
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898) under sections 423 (1) (b), (d) and 439 (2) of section 4 (a) and the Bombay Prevention of Gambling Act (IV) Trial 1887) Punishment pu…
- BALADIN v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH 1956 PLD 249
Constitution of India Constitution of India Article 134 (1) (c) (Constitution of Pakistan, Article 158 (c)) Certificate should identify words and phrases in it.…
- CORPORATION LTD v. A. NAGESHWARA RAO 1956 PLD 266
Companies Act 1913 Companies Act (VII of 1913) Section 162 (vi) Directives of Directors…
- DULICHAND LAXMINARAYAN v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, NAGPUR 1956 PLD 273
Income Tax Act 1922 Income Tax Act (XI of 1922) Section 26 A person is not a firm person Under the General Clause Act (X of 1897), section 3 (42) of the Personal Partnership Act (IX of 1932), section …
- VEMIREDDY SATYANARAYAN REDDY v. STATE OF HYDERABAD 1956 PLD 280
Evidence Act 1872 Section 133 of the Evidence Act (of 1872) testifies to withholding information…
- A. THANGAL KUNJU MUSALIAR v. M. VENKATACHALAM POTTI 1956 PLD 291
Constitution of India Constitution Article 226 (Constitution of Pakistan Article 170) Territorial jurisdiction of the lower court, even if the High Court may issue a writ on a tribunal finding it to b…
- MOSEB KAKA CHOWDHRY v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL 1956 PLD 303
Criminal Procedure Code (CR PC) Criminal Procedure (V9 1898) Section 307 Whether the mere dissent of the jury's verdict is sufficient to refer a sessions judge to the High Court under the section judg…
- LAXMI NARAIN KALRA v. THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH 1956 PLD 311
Pakistan Panel Code Panel Code (XLV of 1860) Section 420 Check is submitted as security is not supported by credit at the bank Receives the check recipient which is unacceptable under Rules on-line re…
- KHACHERU SINGH AND OTHERS v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH 1956 PLD 315
Pakistan Penal Code Penal Code (XLV of 1860) Section 34 Implemented In the first incident the accused attacked the complainant in which the complainant suffered some injuries.…
- MUHAMMAD BAQAR AND OTHERS v. NAIM-UN-NISA BIBI AND OTHERS 1956 PLD 318
Evidence Act 1872 Section 13, 101, 102, 103 and 104 of the Evidence Act (I of 1872) The customary burden of proving a family's customary statement to a person over the age of 22, whether by any weight…
- BANARSIDAS AND OTHERS v. STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND OTHERS 1956 PLD 323
Constitution of India Constitution Article 136 (Constitution of Pakistan, Article 160) Appeal for special leave should be filed within a limited time by the rules of the Supreme Court Limitation Act (…
- SANTA SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB 1956 PLD 327
The Evidence Act 1872 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898) is framed by Section 162 Mapping Evidence, which allows the witnesses to identify the distance of witnesses during interrogation by the police, …
Other years — Supreme Court India
2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1986 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1960 · 1959 · 1957 · 1956
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.