Supreme Appellate Court — Judgments of 1994
20 reported judgments of the Supreme Appellate Court from 1994.
- HIDAYATULLAH v. STATE 1994 PCRLJ 20
The charges required for admission of evidence were conferred on the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 409, 489A, 489C & 489D / 109, which they had full authority over and they deal with it as a result. ha…
- MUHAMMAD SAFDAR v. STATE 1994 PCRLJ 62
The Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Section 10 (3) / 34 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 452/34 Review of Evidence There was no enmity between the complainant's family an…
- MUHAMMAD QAISER v. STATE 1994 PCRLJ 71
The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34 and 301 reviewed the evidence that the molecular evidence was reliable, which was confirmed by the medical evidence, and that the suspect armed with the weapon …
- UMAR BAKHSH v. STATE 1994 MLD 86
Pakistan Panel Code S 336 Testimony of Evidence His view was brutally acted with by the accused whom he used in the attack and was convicted by the trial court.…
- MUHAMMAD QAISER v. STATE 1994 PCRLJ 88
The handling of the illegal arms ordinance, the definition of record of the provisions of sections 7 and 4 of 1991, did not prove section 7, the accused was acquitted…
- ASHFAQ AHMAD v. STATE 1994 PCRLJ 392
Benefits of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34, 392/34 and 460 doubts, if any arise, should be resolved in favor of the accused:…
- WAJID UMAR v. STATE 1994 PCRLJ 409
Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance 1979 Section 17 (4) Explanatory Rule of Evidence (Section XLV of 1860), Sections 302/34, 324/336/34, 324/34 and 353/34 I was not in a position to p…
- ZAHID ALIAS GUDDA v. STATE 1994 PCRLJ 751
The complainant's testimony of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 (b) / 34 and 324/34 of the evidence appears to be factual and credible, which was confirmed by eyewitness and a seriously injured wi…
- KHALID MAHMOOD v. STATE 1994 PCRLJ 757
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 (b) and 7 Off7 Offenses Hurt (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (1979 1979 1979 of VII), Section 10 Records of evidence in the Definition Case of evidence and registers rela…
- GHULAM MURTAZA v. THE STATE 1994 PCRLJ 767
The possibility of confirmation of a police officer's suspicion in the notice of a hearing in a special court for speedy trials, 1992 section 12, cannot be ruled out, and perhaps for that reason he is…
- ABDUL HAMEED v. STATE 1994 PCRLJ 769
Pakistan Panel Code Section 302/34 Validation of Evidence Certified Defensive Version by Medical Evidence Did Not Matter…
- RIAZ v. STATE 1994 PCRLJ 775
Pakistan Panel Code Sections 302 (b) / 149, 324/149, 427/149 and 148 testimonies of evidence were filed immediately to the FIR The presence of eye-witnesses at the time of the incident Ocular evidence…
- MUHAMMAD YAQOOB v. STATE 1994 MLD 1394
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 364A and 302 (b) / 34 along with the recovery of the theft of evidence, the recovery of the body from the accused's offer and the punishment of those found guilty were ret…
- GHULAM MUSTAFA v. STATE 1994 MLD 1400
Crimes Against Property (Enforcement Hoodoo) Ordinance 1979 Section 17 (3) / 34, PPC Panel Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 324/34 and 336/34 Evidence Checking Eyeshadows, Lighting Available Can be caused…
- NADEEM IQBAL ALIAS NAWAB SAHIB v. STATE 1994 MLD 1405
Criminal Procedure of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 Sections 11 and 18/10 ()) While examining the evidence while the infant was walking down the street, the accused dragged him to the roo…
- LAL DIN ALIAS LALU v. STATE 1994 MLD 1414
Pakistan Penal Code Section 2302 (b) / evidence 34 Eyewitnesses who witnessed the testimony have seen the incident and their testimony to the contrary revealed that the suspects were caught with their…
- STATE v. AZMATULLAH 1994 MLD 1418
Sections 302/34, 302/109 and 337F / 34 of the Speedy Trials Act 1992 for linking the accused on appeal record against the Speedy Trials Act (IX of 1992), section 13 (5) There was no evidence. Four day…
- AFTAB MASIH v. STATE 1994 PCRLJ 1580
The testimony of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 (b) / 34, 449/34, 394/34 and 324/34 was found at the time of the witnesses at the time of the fingerprints. By this expert where fingerprint impre…
- ASGHAR ALI v. STATE 1994 PCRLJ 1591
The value of evidence of the Pakistan Penal Code section 392/34 and 365/34 was completely ignored in violation of the essential provisions of section 103, the CCP accused were acquitted on the benefit…
- NASRULLAH KHAN v. STATE 1994 PCRLJ 1835
An FIR was immediately filed in the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302 (b) / 149, 337 f (v) / 149, 337 f (vi) / 149 and 148 in which the accused was considered. And excluding the possibility of false in…
Other years — Supreme Appellate Court
2015 · 2009 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.