Service Tribunal Azad Kashmir — Judgments of 1980
18 reported judgments of the Service Tribunal Azad Kashmir from 1980.
- TASSADAQ HUSSAIN SHAH v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR 1980 PLC(CS) 52
Section Fin Final Order Promotion Order makes the same indication on temporary basis but on probation and is confirmed once the trial period is over, no such order, holding, a final order and no tempo…
- MUHAMMAD ZAMAN v. AZAD JAMMU & KASHMIR GOVERNMENT 1980 PLC(CS) 108
R 16 24 (1) (ix) The compulsory deviation must be recorded by the police officer for complicating matters or for any other reason. No such deviation was thought to have been personally called and hear…
- MAQBOOL AHMED v. INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR 1980 PLC(CS) 112
Chapter XVI, r 16 (1) and (2) of the police personnel of Azad Jammu and Kashmir Department of Punjab Procedure Punjab Police Rules, 1934, cannot be punished by applicable punishment unless provided fo…
- RAFIQUE AKHTAR CHAUDHRY v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR 1980 PLC(CS) 134
Sections 2 (1) (a), 4 and 11 are read with the Independent States of Jammu and Kashmir Roll of Business, 1975, 20 ad hoc appointments, even though eligible, but not in accordance with the rules, are s…
- SAEEDA JAHAN ARA v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR 1980 PLC(CS) 194
Section 49 read with the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servants Act 1974, Section 2 (1) (A) and the rules of business of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Government, 1975, 20 20 Appointments stipulated under…
- Kh. SADDAR-UD-DIN v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF A J & K 1980 PLC(CS) 220
The jurisdiction of sections 3, 4 and 8 of the Tribunal in respect of the terms and conditions of service of public servants, but not jointly with the exception provided in sections (a), (b) and (c) o…
- IFTIKHAR AHMED v. AZAD GOVERNMENT' OF THE STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR 1980 PLC(CS) 385
R 32 Principles of degree reduction, rule violation and natural justice without cause and defense opportunity…
- ABDUL QAYYUM MIR v. AZAD JAMMU & KASHMIR GOVERNMENT 1980 PLC(CS) 400
Under the Legislative Authority, any legislation which may be construed under the law and the enforcement of appropriate legislation in the absence of power is not valid and neither can constitute a r…
- SARBLAND KHAN v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF J & K 1980 PLC(CS) 400
The authority to set rules that the government must approve of the implementation of appropriate legislation that is not behind such legal approval cannot be considered as much executive orders or dir…
- QAMARUZ ZAMAN NIAZI v. GOVERNMENT OF AZAD JAMMU & KASHMIR 1980 PLC(CS) 400
Show the cause of the principle of natural justice, the Audi ultimatum partum, before the principle affecting the status quo applies to the case of a person who, under the service agreement, gains a v…
- Malik REHMAT DIN v. AZAD KASHMIR GOVERNMENT 1980 PLC(CS) 400
At this time, the mere appeal before the Proviso (C) court, which may be sustained against the original or appellate order of the department, cannot be granted on the representation or application mad…
- Miss TAHIRA TALAT v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR 1980 PLC(CS) 443
Challenge the transfer of Intermediate College from the position of Principal, Intermediate College as Principal Appellant Manager to Section 4, any violation of the terms and conditions of the Appell…
- ABDUL RASHID KHAN v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MIRPUR 1980 PLC(CS) 466
Appeals before the Section 4 Tribunal Two separate orders of the department authority passed on different dates cannot be brought in the same appeal, in the same appeal, each cause of action was to be…
- MISS TAHIRA TALAT v. AZAD J & K GOVERNMENT 1980 PLC(CS) 486
Read with Section 4 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Delay Restriction Request Only after delay of more than 1 year after arguing about the limitations raised by the respondents Appeal of condol…
- MUHAMMAD ABDUL AZIZ ABBASI v. AZAD GOVERNMENT CAF STATE OF J & K 1980 PLC(CS) 526
Section,, Fitness circle for promoting proviso (b) (i)…
- MUHAMMAD HANIF KHAWAJA v. AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF J & K 1980 PLC(CS) 564
Section 3, Proviso (b) (ii) dismisses the jurisdiction of the Tribunal in the event of termination, removal, reduction of office or disciplinary proceedings with any other than compulsory retirement, …
- MUHAMMAD GULZAR HIJAZI v. AZAD GOVT. OF THE STATE OF JAMMU & KASHMIR 1980 PLC(CS) 586
The solution was explored for various reasons for the treatment of Section 4 and various respondents joined together…
- S. AOLAD ALI GILLANI v. GOVERNMENT OE AZAD JAMMU & KASHMIR 1980 PLC(CS) 659
Section 4, Proviso (b) (ii) minor penalty civil suit not to appear before tribunal treatment by Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servant (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1977, r 4.…
Other years — Service Tribunal Azad Kashmir
2009 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1986 · 1984 · 1980 · 1979 · 1978 · 1977
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.