Privy Council — Judgments of 1949
35 reported judgments of the Privy Council from 1949.
- NORTH WEST FRONTIER PROVINCE v. SURAJ NARAIN ANAND 1949 PLD 1
Government of India Act 1935 Government of India Act 1919, Section 96B North-West Frontier Police Rules 1917 Amendment, Roll 17 1 Sub Inspector General For the Police, the Deputy Inspector General is …
- BELI RAM v. CHAUDHRI MUHAMMAD AFZAL 1949 PLD 8
Muslim Waqf Authentication Act 1913 Conditions of Waqf Waqf There is no doubt that the authenticity of Waqf also includes that the Waqf was intended to be dedicated where there is evidence that Waqf h…
- MUHAMMAD JAN v. RAFI-UD-DIN 1949 PLD 18
Punjab Laws Act 1872 Customs (Punjab) Punjab Laws Act (IV of 1872), Section 5 Does not make any assumption in favor of customs that the parties operating under customs have to prove it by claiming tha…
- BHAGWAN DAS v. THE KING 1949 PLD 21
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), S 492 Section 49, Appointment of the Executive Authority of the State's Public Prosecutor resting in the Governor under the Governme…
- N. S. VENKATAGIRI AYYANGAR v. THE HINDU RELIGIOUS ENDOWMENTS BOARD, MADRAS 1949 PLD 26
Section 115 Section Requirements That the High Court Should Be Satisfied Before Interfering The High Court cannot merely intervene on the ground that it differs from the lower court on questions of la…
- THE GOVERNMENT of THE PROVINCE OF BOMBAY v. PESTONJI ARDESHIR WADIA 1949 PLD 31
Section 11, Explanation IV The case which may have been the basis of defense or attack, but it was impossible to say whether it should have made such land, is not directly and substantially important …
- TUMAHOLE BERENG v. THE KING 1949 PLD 47
Proof of affiliation with Corbett by another partner (whether the later amended Bossland Criminal Procedure and Evidence Declaration, 1938), section 231…
- PROMODE KUMAR ROY v. NIKHII, BHUSAN MUKHOPADHYA 1949 PLD 59
Section (36 ()) should be general to the Assignee and not to any special or limited meaning…
- BHUBONI SAHU v. THE KING 1949 PLD 90
Section 3 Co-accused's Confession Proof of Weak Role The co-accused's confession is clearly a very weak type of evidence. In fact, the evidence does not fit the evidence contained in Section 3 of the …
- YUSOFALLI MULLA NOORBHOY v. THE KING 1949 PLD 108
Based on section 403, the ex-court must be able to record the sentence of sentence or acquittal if the previous trial was not authorized without the permission.…
- JOY CHAND LAL BABU v. KAMALAKSHA CHAUDUURY 1949 PLD 114
The orders approved in section 109, (a) (c) are not covered under section 109 (a) and cannot be presented to the council in section 109 (c) to cover the appeal from the order in review.…
- THE SREE MEENAKSHI MILLS, LTD. v. THE PROVINCIAL TEXTILE COMMISSIONER, MADRAS 1949 PLD 129
CL 18B (1) (b) should normally be used to cover the yarn delivered by the mill in the form of woven cloth to be returned to the fabric.…
- JADUNATH ROY v. KSHITISH CHANDRA ACHARJYA CHOUDHURY 1949 PLD 136
Section 36 (1) Proviso (ii), (4) The mortgage suit for a sufficient amount to repay the loan will not be considered to be fully satisfied unless the personal decree is still in execution-related relie…
- SHA SHIVARAJ GOPALJI v. EDAPPAKATH AYISSA. BI 1949 PLD 143
Section 11 point that can be raised in previous proceedings, not taken judgment in previous proceedings still serves as justice in subsequent proceedings…
- MOHANLAL HARGOVIND OF J UBBULPORE v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CENTRAL PROVINCES AND BERAR, NAGPUR 1949 PLD 147
Section 10 (2) paragraph (xii) allowance for expenditure for business purposes, incurred for making rapper of leaves on official forest leaves…
- T. A. MENON v. THE KING 1949 PLD 195
The Governor of section 197 cannot specify a court under section 197 (2) unless it is approved under section 197 (1).…
- LAKSHMIDHAR MISRA v. RANGALAL 1949 PLD 198
Section 100 Whether the question of law can be ascertained in the law, such as the existence of a village custom from which the law may permit, to ascertain the fact it is a question of law; however, …
- SANMUKHSING v. THE KING 1949 PLD 207
Section 195 (1) (c) copy of the forged documents was not produced in the court section. It does not attract the documents. Documents were presented in the document that intended to be copied (but with…
- SUDARSAN DAS v. Mahanth RAM KIRPAL DAS 1949 PLD 209
The first schedule, Article 134B Execution Cell, which is not covered, involves the reading of this Article in the case of transfer of a Jerusalem property by implementing an order to enforce Article …
- THE PROVINCIAL TREASURER OF MANITOBA v. WM. WRIGLEY JR. COMPANY LTD. 1949 PLD 216
In one place the manufacture of Income Tax Goods, another part of the sale was the Income Tax Act (XI of 1922), Section 42 (3) of the respondent was a Dominion Company with a head office and manufactu…
- NARAYAN JIVAJI PATIL in substitution for SHANKAR DYAMANGOUDA PATIL v. GURUNATH KHANDAPPAGOUDA PATIL 1949 PLD 232
The demarcation suit by the son to occupy the joint Hindu family, the property adoption limit suit after being jointly withheld, was withheld by the Prohibited Limitation Act (IX of 1908), the first S…
- TIRUCHENDUR SRI SUBRAMANIASWAMI TEMPLE v. P. RAMASWAMIA PILLAI 1949 PLD 242
Have I given the son, Pacha Pul, rights to all my properties and money etc., and if he or his son does not have any children, he will enjoy the aforesaid property, Subramanessorni in the said property…
- MISR1 LAL NAYAK v. Mst SURJI alias RAMDULARI 1949 PLD 250
O 41, R 4 The only heir of the Joint Hindu Family who has a similar interest can appeal against it when the appeal was filed in the High Court, the first respondent was Santi Nayak, but he appealed. S…
- THE GOVERNOR-GENERAL IN COUNCIL v. CONSTANCE ZENA WELLS 1949 PLD 254
Section 3 (d) does not work to defraud ordinary employment…
- LUMBHARDAR ZUTSHI v. THE KING 1949 PLD 257
Under section 161 PPC approval, section 197 offense is not necessary, when the appellants were allowed to leave the appeal, it was still an open question whether under section 197 of the Code of Crimi…
- ZAKKA PATTABHIRAMI REDDI v. MENAKUR BALARAMI REDDI 1949 PLD 263
Madras Hindu Religious Endowments Act (II27 of 1927), Section 9 (13) and 40 D Facts Trustees of Powers…
- KANDA v. WAGHU 1949 PLD 270
U 15, O VI, r 17 Permanent use of power modification in accordance with legal principles u1 not allowed to compile a new case Amendment options granted by the Code are very broad, but they are used in…
- GOVINDRAM GORDHANDAS SEKSARIA v. THE STATE OF GONDAL BY HIS HIGHNESS THE MAIIARAJA OF GONDAL 1949 PLD 279
Section 69 Interest Rate Not Required Interest in the property to which the payment relates or the legal property interest in such property is bound by law.…
- LALA MANMOHAN DAS v. THE UNITED PROVINCES 1949 PLD 296
Section 9 (2) (3) Charges for transfer of fleet in the meaning of section void…
- THE BANK OF INDIA LTD. v. JAMSETJI A. H. CHINOY AND MESSRS. CHINOY & Co. 1949 PLD 305
Section 27 (2) Shares sale contract is not a fair remedy for losses if company shares are limited market.…
- SARDAR AUTAR SINGH v. Raja SIR MUHAMMAD EJAZ RASOOL KHAN 1949 PLD 321
O 34 r 2 and 3 The Final Decree for Procedure Processing The court has no jurisdiction to reopen the final decree on an equal basis and to relieve sections 60 and 98 of the TP Act Increase time.…
- GHULAM HUSSAIN v. THE KING 1949 PLD 326
Under section 164 the defendant's statement, which is not an admission of guilt, which is admissible against the accused, even though it is evidence against himself (Act of 1872), sections 18 to 21 \ …
- SHANKARLAL PATWARI v. HIRALAL MURARKA 1949 PLD 331
Remand discretion of the Appellate Court Civil Procedure Code (V 1908), O XLI, Section 23, 24…
- SURENDRA NATH SARKAR v. Sree Sree ISWAR LAKSHMI DURGA 1949 PLD 334
Debit words and phrases refrain from any idea of repayment. Whatever is debited, it can be intended (and sometimes used in the ambiguous sense) to compensate for any idea of compensation. Have to be e…
- RAM KISSENDAS DHANUKA v. SATYA CHARAN LAW 1949 PLD 339
The purpose of this BBB is fully directed to prevent the removal of any type of administrative agent without the solution of the Articles of the Company.…
Other years — Privy Council
1960 · 1959 · 1957 · 1956 · 1953 · 1952 · 1951 · 1950 · 1949 · 1948 · 1947
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.